Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Pay to Play Law Blog

Articles, resources, insights on pay to play regulations on the federal and state level

open menu close menu

Pay to Play Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Alabama
    • Alaska
    • California
      • CalPERS
    • Citizens United
    • Colorado
    • Commodities Futures Trading Commission
    • Compliance
    • Connecticut
    • District of Columbia
    • Exempt Organizations
    • Federal Contractors
    • Federal Government
    • Federal Lobbyists
    • First Amendment
    • Florida
    • General
    • Georgia
    • Hawaii
    • Illinois
    • In The News
    • Indiana
    • Kentucky
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Missouri
    • Montana
    • Nevada
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • North Carolina
    • Ohio
    • Pennsylvania
    • Philadelphia
    • Rhode Island
    • SEC
    • Texas
    • Transparency

California expands pay-to-play law

By Benjamin Keane, Michael Pfeifer, and Merrill Weber
November 4, 2022
  • California
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

California has recently added a new pay-to-play law to the books, increasing the burden on state and local officials and those doing or seeking to do business in the state. Governor Newsom signed SB 1439 into law on September 29th, substantially increasing the number of California officials subject to pay to play prohibitions and lengthening the period of time during which contributions to those officials are prohibited.

The new California pay-to-play legislation makes two substantive changes to current law, which is already extensive. First, it extends the current law’s “contribution prohibition period” for covered parties, participants and agents to a proceeding from three months following the final decision in a proceeding to twelve months following the final decision. Second, it eliminates an exemption previously applicable to elected officials of local agencies so that they will now be considered covered “officials” for pay-to-play purposes. Thus, when the law goes into effect in January 2023, local elected officials, such as members of school boards, city councils, boards of supervisors, and similar agencies, will be under the purview of the state pay-to-play framework. 

California’s current pay-to-play framework prohibits a party, participant or agent to a proceeding involving a license, permit or other entitlement for use pending before any state agency from making a contribution of more than $250 to an officer of the agency in question while the proceeding is pending and for three months thereafter. While the definition of a “proceeding involving a license, permit or other entitlement for use” for the purposes of the pay-to-play rule includes many state contracts, contracts that are competitively bid, labor contracts and personal employment contracts fall outside the definition. The contribution prohibition is also construed broadly, so its bar on giving applies to: parties who file applications or are the subjects of proceedings; participants who actively support or oppose decisions in proceedings, including lobbyists; and agents of both, including majority owners and parents/subsidiaries. The current scope of the term “officer” includes elected or appointed officers of, and candidates for, many state or local government agencies and members of the governing board or commission of any public agency. With the enactment of SB 1439, individuals appointed to such positions with local agencies will also be covered by pay-to-play laws beginning in January 2023.

The passage of SB 1439 follows in the wake of a series of recent corruption scandals involving public officials across the state, including in Los Angeles, Anaheim, and San Francisco.  This subtle expansion of the state’s pay-to-play provisions is likely just the first of many shoes likely to drop in the next few years as legislators and regulators across the state explore additional avenues to stamp out the influence of campaign contributions in state and local procurement. In light of this recent change and those yet to come, businesses operating in the Golden State should  be careful to vet their participation in California politics to minimize compliance risk and ensure alignment with the state’s rapidly-changing regulatory schemes.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
California, pay-to-play
Benjamin Keane

About Benjamin Keane

Ben Keane is a Partner in the Washington, DC and Atlanta, GA offices of Dentons and co-head of the firm’s Political Law, Ethics and Disclosure Team. Mr. Keane focuses his practice on the representation of elected officials, political candidates, PACs, SuperPACs, political parties, corporations, non-profit organizations and other entities with regard to federal, state and local election law, campaign finance, lobbying, pay-to-play, and ethics matters. He regularly counsels businesses, trade associations and other non-profits on the establishment and maintenance of successful political law compliance frameworks. Additionally, Mr. Keane assists clients across the country with political law investigation and audit matters involving federal, state and local government authorities, and frequently counsels presidential nominees, appointees and other federal officials on confirmation and ethics matters.

All posts Full bio

Michael Pfeifer

About Michael Pfeifer

Michael Pfeifer is member of Dentons' Political Law, Ethics and Disclosure team. The focus of his practice is providing lobbying, campaign finance, and government ethics compliance counsel and representation to trade associations, political action committees (PACs), corporations and other business entities, non-profit organizations and elected officials at the federal, state and local levels.

All posts Full bio

Merrill Weber

Merrill Weber

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • California
  • In The News

Pay to Play Updates – December 2022

By Benjamin Keane, Michael Zolandz, C. Randall Nuckolls, Michael Pfeifer, and Merrill Weber
  • California

California’s New “Habit” of Pay-to-Play Regulation in the Public Employee Pension Fund Arena

By Benjamin Keane
  • California
  • Transparency

California Campaign Finance Watchdog Approves New Disclosure Rules Regarding Behested Payments

By Benjamin Keane and Michael Pfeifer

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site