Hear No Lobbyists, See No Lobbyists

November 30, 2009, Stefan Passantino, Head of the Political Law practice at McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP and expert panelist for the National Journal: Under the Influence Blog.

Stefan Passantino contributes a blog entry concerning the White House’s new restrictions of lobbyists serving on government advisory boards. He argues that it is the responsibility of lawmakers, as the country’s legislative decision-makers, to make an informed decision based on information from all sides.

He says, “There is no doubt that most lobbyists are highly skilled, knowledgeable, and effective communicators of their clients' interests. Those are not reasons for any government to impose artificial restrictions on the ability of lobbyists to communicate with government. These are reasons for government to ensure that it is being thoughtful before acting. It is the job of government, not the private sector, and certainly not lobbyists, to assimilate all of the available information and data surrounding a particular issue before adopting the policy position or regulation best suited for the governed.”

He suggests that “rather than seek to impose some internal controls on the mechanisms of government decision-making to ensure that government ultimately adopts positions best suited to the governed, this administration has elected to impose impediments to its own access to information from a single class of individuals skilled at providing that information. That might make for good politics on the campaign trail, but it makes for lousy public policy.”

To read the entire entry please click here.

GOP 'legal defense' plan raises disclosure issue

November 27, 2009, John O'Connor, The State

Stefan Passantino is quoted discussing the increase of legal defense funds at the state level, rather than just at the federal level. This concerns some, as the public is unaware of who is donating money to these funds or how much, since there is currently no contribution limit. There is debate about the ethics of this type of fund, however, candidates’ parties will often pick up the bill for things like unfounded accusations.

"Both sides of the aisle were using the ethics process as a weapon with some effectiveness," Passantino said. "That is a trend that has become exponentially more prevalent."

To read the full article click here.

Your Morning Jolt: Lessons on how to pay-to-play nice

October 21, 2009, Jim Galloway, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Jim Galloway discusses the alliance of Rick Thompson and McKenna Long & Aldridge’s Political Law group after his exit from the Georgia State Ethics Commission. He also mentions the blog and discusses some of the latest pay-to-play issues faced by the City of Atlanta.

“Georgia corporations and candidates have come under ever-increasing scrutiny in recent years,” said Political Law Team Leader Stefan Passantino. “Having the ability to team with the ultimate Ethics Commission insider on issues pertaining to filings and the Committee’s most pressing concerns is an invaluable asset for our clients.”

Read the full article here.